Aspect ratios in the cinemasCopyright ©: Eivind A.C. Eikenes, 2020 |
Index
page
(Norwegian) |
Return to "Billedformater på kino" |
Streaming vs the
cinema theatres. |
All
of
the
photos
and
other
illustrations
on
this
page
are
copyright
©
their
respective
copyright
holders.
All
company
names
and
trade
marks
mentioned
are
™
and/or
®
their
respective
owners. |
Aspect
ratios on release prints of films.![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The sound film aspect ratios are
from left to right: 1.20:1 – 1:37:1 – 1.85:1 (All are on 35mm film) (The illustrations are in a smaller scale compared with the rest of this page.) (Return to Widescreen.) Photos from „The Art Of Film Projection” (Editor: Paolo Cherchi Usai) George Eastman Museum, 2019 Illustrations ref.: Amazon |
The
illustrations
below
are
relative
to
the
actual
height
of
the
pictureframes. In reality the pictures were enlarged to fit the screen. |
||
Type |
Aspect ratio |
Comments |
Standard format |
1.33:1 The frame is from the movie „The Black Pirate” (Technicolor2). ![]() Illustration ref.: Movies Silently. |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FehpP0GChNE. |
In
the
latter
part
of
the
1920s
and
the
beginning
of
the
1930s
the
film
industry
experimented
with
larger
screens
and
new
film
formats. Even though it was impressive to watch, it fell through. Some of the reasons were lack of standardization, the depression and the economic situation of the owners of the cinemas. |
||
Magnascope (Paramount) |
For
the
movie
„Old
Ironsides"
an extra large screen was used. It was masked to normal
format. Using a short focal length lens the picture in parts of the
movie was enlarged. At the same time the masking was removed from the
screen.![]() Illustration ref.: The Movie Title Stills Collection. http://annyas.com/screenshots/updates/?s=Old+Ironsides |
Magnascope was never in use in
Stavanger. |
Fanthom Screen (MGM) |
Fanthom
Screen
was
used
in
two
parts
of
the
movie
„The Trail of '98”. A short
focal lenght lens was used
to enlarge the picture. At the same time the screen was
moved
closer to the audience. (Ref.: Ariel Rogers: On the
Screen:
Displaying the Moving
Image, 1926–1942) The movietone-version on the left hand side is in the
aspect ratio 1.20:1. The silent version on the right hand side is in
the aspect ratio 1.33:1. Ref.: IMDb)![]() ![]() Illustration 1.20:1 ratio ref.: Silentsaregolden.com. Illustration 1.33:1 ratio „The Trail of '98” ref.: Movies Silently |
Fanthom Screen was never in use
in
Stavanger. Ref.: http://www.silentsaregolden.com/featurefolder10/trailof98scenes.html Ref.: http://moviessilently.com/2014/01/16/the-trail-of-98-1928-a-silent-film-review/#more-9486 |
Vitascope (Warner) |
The
movie
„The Lash” was filmed in Vitascope which is a
Warner Bros. Widescreen-format on 65mm film. The aspect ratio is
2.05:1. It was also filmed in 1.33:1. Ref.: IMDb
(https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0021048/).![]() Illustration ref.: Los Angeles Theatres (https://losangelestheatres.blogspot.com/2017/02/warner-hollywood-overview.html). The original er 65 mm wide and includes the perforations. The picture is 5 perf. high. Here the enlargement makes the picture unsharp. |
Vitascope was never screened in
Stavanger.![]() This logo was in use by Warner Bros. 1937–1948. Ref.: The Movie Title Stills Collection. http://annyas.com/screenshots/warner-bros-logo/ |
Common
for
the
movies
in
Magnascope
(Paramount),
Fanthom
Screen (MGM),
Vitascope (Warner)
and Grandeur (Fox) were
that
they
completely
or partly
were
projected
on
a
larger
screen. |
||
Grandeur (70mm) (Fox) |
2.13:1
(Ref.: Donald Crafton: The Talkies: American Cinema's
Transition to Sound, 1926-1931. University of
California Press, 1997)![]() Illustration ref.: The Movie Title Stills Collection. |
Only two cinemas were equipped to screen
Grandeur. Both were in the USA. Grandeur was never screened in Stavanger. The restored 70mm version of „The Big Trail” is on YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y8vJ4R8mkVY A slight cropping has been done at the top and bottom of the title card in the the Grandeur version compared to the 35mm version. Ref.: http://annyas.com/screenshots/updates/big-trail-1930-john-wayne/ |
Optical sound |
1.20:1
The
optical
sound
track
reduced
the
width
of
the
picture.![]() Illustration ref.: dvdbeaver.com |
The 1.20:1 optical sound version of „The
Big Trail” (from 1930). Ref.: http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film4/blu-ray_reviews57/the_big_trail_blu-ray.htm |
Academy ratio |
1.37:1. This aspect ratio became the new
standard format accommodating for the optical sound track.![]() Illustration ref.: Screengrabsaz |
„Strangers
On
A
Train”
(from 1951). Ref.: https://screengrabsaz.wordpress.com/2014/03/18/strangers-on-a-train/ |
Wide screen in the
1950s and 1960s 20 years after the first attempts, the large formats returned. The problem was still lack of standardization. The reason for the introduction of wide screen, colour and stereo in the cinemas in the 1950s was the competition the film industry got in the USA from the television. |
||
Cinerama Cinemiracle Kinopanorama |
2.59:1
(Magnetic stereo soundtrack) The frame is from the movie „Windjammer". Here shown in Smilebox. ![]() Illustration ref.: Flicker Alley. (https://www.flickeralley.com/screenings/cinerama-dcp/) Follow the link and click on Images |
Cinerama was presented in 1952. Cinerama, Cinemiracle and Kinopanorama (Kинопанорама) were compatible. Three pictures were shown side by side. Cinerama has a picture 6 perf. high and was shot on 35mm film. When the three pictures were projected, two vertical lines were visible where the pictures met. Academy ratio has a picture 4 perf. high. In order to present Cinerama you needed a 146° curved, louvered screen, three projectors, one machine to reproduce the sound (all four syncronized), and one backup projector for the breakdown film, a number of loudspeakers for seven channels of sound (five behind the screen and two in the auditorium). Ref.: The American WideScreen Museum. http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/cineramaspecs.htm To present the Cinerama-movies in non-cinerama cinemas required copies in 35mm CinemaScope (CS) and/or 70mm: This is Cinerama (70mm) (Ref.: IMDb) Windjammer (CS) (Ref.: Flicker Alley) How The West Was Won (CS) (Ref.: IMDb) The Wonderful World of the Brothers Grimm (CS) (Ref.: IMDb) The restorings of the original Cinerama/Cinemiracle/Kinopanorama movies on Flicker Alley in Smilebox are to be applauded. I have them all on DVD/Blu-ray. More on Cinerama at the bottom of this page. |
Widescreen | 1.66:1 (1.85:1)![]() Illustration ref.: The Movie Title Stills Collection who presents it in the Academy ratio. http://annyas.com/screenshots/updates/shane-1953-george-stevens/ Here the illustration is cropped to 1.66:1. |
„Shane”
(from 1953) was made in Academy ratio, but presented in
35mm Widescreen using open matte. (The picture was matted when
projected. The technique is also called soft matte.) Widescreen may be presented without any special equipment. Any movie in Widescreen projected as a movie in Academy ratio, will have black borders top and bottom of the film frame (Letterbox) provided hard matte is used on the release print. (Ref.: Above.) Wider screen and a lens of shorter focal lenght solve the problem. Some cinemas could adjust both the height and the width of the screen. |
CinemaScope |
![]() ![]() Illustration ref.: Syndicate Entertainment AB. Illustration ref.: Syndicate Entertainment AB. CinemaScope optical sound. CinemaScope mag-optical sound. „Ferry To Hong Kong”. 1959. Format: 2.35:1. Ref.: IMDb. „The Man Who Never Was”. 1956. Format: 2.55:1 Ref.: IMDb. http://www.syndicate.se/syndicate-pl-modifed-bauch-lomb-baltar-cinemascopes/ |
Mag-optical prints have a half
width optical sound track and four magnetic sound tracks. In order to
accommodate the sound tracks, the prints were made on film stock with
the smaller CinemaScope perforations. These perforations were nicknamed
„Fox-holes”. (Ref.: Daniel J. Sherlock: WIDE SCREEN MOVIES CORRECTIONS - Rev. 2.0 - Revised December, 2004. © Copyright 1994-2004 and Bausch & Lomb Baltar Cinemascopes) http://www.film-tech.com/warehouse/tips/WSMC20.pdf |
CinemaScope | 2.55:1 (2.35:1) (The picture is horisontally
compressed. An anamorphic lens widens the picture.)![]() Illustration ref.: The Movie Title Stills Collection. http://annyas.com/screenshots/updates/seven-brides-for-seven-brothers-1954/ |
„The Robe” (from 1953)
was the first movie in CinemaScope. CinemaScope has a picture 4 perf. high and could have magnetic stereo soundtrack. CinemaScope is the name of 20th Century-Fox' anamorphic widescreen system. |
Superscope | 2.0:1 (The picture is horisontally compressed.
An anamorphic lens widens the picture. It is not as wide as
CinemaScope.)![]() Illustration ref.: The Movie Title Stills Collection. http://annyas.com/screenshots/updates/vera-cruz-1954-robert-aldrich-gary-cooper-burt-lancaster-ernest-borgnine/ |
„Vera Cruz” (from 1954). Superscope and CinemaScope both have a picture 4 perf. high. |
VistaVision | 1.66:1 (1.85:1) (1.96:1)![]() The illustration (in format 1.78:1) ref.: The Movie Title Stills Collection. http://annyas.com/screenshots/updates/white-christmas-1954-michael-curtiz-bing-crosby-danny-kaye/ |
„White Christmas” (from
1954) was the first movie in VistaVision.![]() Illustration ref.: The Digital Bits https://thedigitalbits.com/images/columns/coate_history/thief/vistavision5.jpg VistaVision projected at the same width as CinemaScope, would give a picture which was higher than CinemaScope. (Ref.: www.in70mm.com/presents/1954_vistavision/process/index.htm) Technirama is an anamorphic version of VistaVision. (Ref.: www.in70mm.com) |
70mm ToddAO |
2.20:1 (Magnetic
stero soundtrack) The frame is from the 70mm ToddAO-version of „Oklahoma!”. ![]() Illustration ref.: cinematography.com. https://cinematography.com/index.php?/topic/65410-oklahoma-1955/ |
„Oklahoma!” (from 1955). 70mm ToddAO has a picture 5 perf. high. |
Super Panavision 70 | 2.20:1
(2.35:1) (Magnetic
stereo soundtrack)
Ref.:
IMDb. The frame is from „Lawrence of Arabia”. ![]() Illustration ref.: The American WideScreen Museum. http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/loa/loa3a.htm |
„Lawrence of Arabia” (from
1962). Super Panavision has a picture 5 perf. high. |
MGM Camera 65 later known as Ultra Panavision 70 |
2.76:1 (Magnetic stereo soundtrack) (The picture is horisontally compressed.
It must be shown with an anamorphic lens to avoid horisontal
distortion.) The frame is from the movie „Ben Hur”. ![]() Illustration ref.: American Cinematographer. https://ascmag.com/articles/flashback-ben-hur-1959 |
„Ben Hur” (from
1959). MGM Camera 65 has a picture 5 perf. high. |
IMAX |
1.43:1 The frame is from
the movie „Dunkirk”.![]() Illustration ref.: Film blogging the reel world. https://www.slashfilm.com/dunkirk-70mm-locations/ |
IMAX uses a 70mm wide film
running horizontally in the camera. Each frame is 15 perf. high and
equals three frames of the earlier 70mm-format. IMAX is the big brother of VistaVision, (Ref.: www.in70mm.com) |
In the 1960s the Academy
format, Widescreen (1.66:1 and 1.85:1) and Cinemascope (2.35:1)
became the standard
aspect ratios in the cinemas. European widescreen = 1.66:1. US
widescreen = 1.85:1. A 16:9 TV has an aspect ratio of 1.78:1. The author is a certified cinema projectionist. |
||
Cinerama:
In
2012
three
cinemas
could
still
present
Cinerama
in
its
original
form:
Seattle
Cinerama
Theatre
in
the
USA,
Bradford
Media
Museum
in
the
UK
and
Cinerama
Dome
in
Hollywood
(Ref.: Flicker
Alley
https://www.flickeralley.com/why-so-serious-how-cineramas-smilebox-came-to-be/). Thanks to Smilebox is it today possible to experience Cinerama on video. Smilebox gives an impression of a curved screen. You do however still need a large screen in order to get the real impression. The author experienced Cinerama with three projectors in Copenhagen in October 1963 („Cinerama Holiday”) and Cinerama with one projector (70mm Cinerama) in London in October 1966 („Battle of the Bulge” and „Khartoum”) (Ref.: My memories and my archive). |
||
More information on the different
aspect
ratios and film gauges: Academic (https://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/142897), Adrian Goodwin: The Essential Reference Guide for Filmmakers (Kodak) (https://slideplayer.com/slide/12910355/), The American WideScreen Museum (http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/), Cinemateket (https://www.cinemateket.no/artikler/bildeformater), DVDLOG.de Film Format Guide (http://www.dvdlog.de/filmformate/filmformate-en.htm), First Year of Widescreen Production (http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/the-first-year-of-widescreen), Gone with the Wind (70mm) (https://classicfilmjournal.com/2020/03/24/revisiting-gone-with-the-wind/) and (http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/special/gwtw.htm) Lenny Lipton: The Cinema in Flux - The Evolution of Motion Picture Technology from the Magic Lantern to the Digital Era, Rick Mitchell: Projection and Wide Film - Early Wide Film Experiments (https://www.in70mm.co/news/2014/mitchell_book/chapter/index.htm), More than one hundred years of Film Sizes (https://wichm.home.xs4all.nl/filmsize.html), quadibloc (http://www.quadibloc.com/other/aspint.htm), Syndicate PL modified – Bausch & Lomb Baltar Cinemascopes (http://www.syndicate.se/syndicate-pl-modifed-bauch-lomb-baltar-cinemascopes/), Widescreen Documentation (http://www.3dfilmarchive.com/home/widescreen-documentation) and Widescreen.org (https://www.widescreen.org/index.shtml). |
||
Cinemas vs streaming or video at home. Movies are much better at the cinemas than on your cellphone or your computer. Streaming is interesting, but watching the movies on the really big screen is something quite different. No matter how large your TV or screen is at home, the colloquial experience at the cinemas surpasses it. What matters most is how large the projected picture is. I have no financial interests in the movie industry. Personal experience way back in the 1950s and later told me that movies really are better on the big screen. |
||
The external
links are not clickable and EaCe carries no
responsibility for any of them. Please let me know of links not working. |